This is what jurist Guido Calabresi calls the “gift of the evil spirit”:
When we prefer the car
that some people
may they die
In this question the
number of victims is ten times greater
The population is three and a half times smaller, but the potential benefits are greater and there is no annual recurrence.
I don’t think that many of those who would reject the hypothetical gift would deprive themselves of the comfort of the car in real life, although the risk/reward profile between the two “models” is not that different.